IBM Data Centre Vision Highlights
- Separates ‘systems of engagement’ from ‘systems of record’ trends
- Reviews the increasing CIO challenges
- Sees a need to accelerate business velocity
- Focuses on reducing server management and admin costs as a proportion of data centre spending
- Identifies six trends in consolidation over time
- Offers integrated offerings (such as PureSystems) to intersect these evolving user needs
- We believe it offers Matrix Integration, protecting customers from future lock-in
Notes: Large = >1k , Medium = 100-1k, Small = <100 employee organisations; IT services, software applications and tools and OEM business excluded
IBM’s European STG meeting is one of the most important events of the year for ITCandor and I was sorry not to be able to join in person this year. Luckily Ambuj Goyal’s keynote presentation was broadcasted on Twitter’s Livestream, giving me an excellent opportunity to follow along, tweet and ask questions. You’ll be interested to learn about IBM’s approach, which includes some deep thinking about data centre trends and its customers’ changing needs.
Data Centre Trends – Separating Systems Of Engagement From Systems Of Record
Ambuj’s ideas include looking at how users interact with systems from how and where information is stored, referring to these as ‘systems of engagement’ and ‘systems of record’ respectively. While companies need to make sure their data retention and protection policies are managed in line with compliance with legislation and regulations, they also need to support deeper interaction from internal and external customers. ‘Systems of engagement’ is the newer trend at the heart of the Internet data centres in public Clouds, but also needs to be considered in traditional data centres whose primary focus is on transaction processing – financial institutions, for instance, need to add not just Internet banking, but also new types of social business processes (we’ve already seen how the bank Ing now claims to address emotional alongside the transactional needs of its customers). He noted that users need to know where the record resides to manage it from a regularity point of view, but the rest is a question of how you manage sprawl.
The CIO’s Systems View Is Full Of Applications And Processes
Ambuj noted that CIOs have an application/workload view of system, even in small and medium sized businesses. They have seen a steady rise in the number and associated costs of underlying systems, licenses and the vendors they need to manage. They also have an urgent need to accelerate business velocity. However data centre managers shouldn’t blame CIOs for rising costs.
IBM believes that the total cost of server management and administration were 66% of data centre costs in 2011 and rising. Ambuj noted 6 different forms of consolidation used to address data centre sprawl, which he labelled (in order):
- consolidation upgrades
- consolidate without migration
- consolidate with standardisation
- ‘full in place’ consolidation
- dev-ops model transformation
- programming model shift
He also profiled how the data centre of the future will need to incorporate standard stacks, converged infrastructures, recovery-oriented computing, Software Defined Data Centres, data centre OSes to handle their data and transactions.
IBM Offers Integrated Systems To Intersect Evolving Data Centre Needs
As we’ve noted before IBM is building an increasing number of integrated systems to help its customers with these challenges and of course Ambuj mentioned its most recently introduced Power 7+ , PureData and storage (DS8870, Storwise V7000 and TS7700) offerings. He sees the role of STG’s 23k engineers as helping its systems move to where in the world and CIOs are moving towards. They are involved in introducing standardisation, while trying to prevent user lock-in and advising on future systems design. He summarised by saying that IBM’s approach is designed to help its customers leverage the Cloud, unlock Big Data and secure their critical information.
Some Conclusions – The Pros And Cons Of Integration
IBM is a server – and large user – centric supplier (see Figure 1 for our view of its data centre revenues by offering and user size), so it’s hardly surprising that it takes a workload view of data centre computing. In this presentation it offered some new insight into how to look at an old subject – especially in the need to focus on ‘systems of engagement’ and how the nature of consolidation changes over time.
Data centre users spent $141 billion (47.4% of the total) on internal staff in the year to June and reducing these costs is central to any supplier’s success. IBM – like other systems suppliers – is offering integration, automation and standardisation as ways of meeting the competing challenges of restrictive budgets and increasing workloads. To take advantage its customers will undoubtedly give up some of the freedom of compoent selection they’ve been used to. IBM will need to protect them from future lock-in, engaging in what we term ‘Matrix’ – rather than ‘Vertical – integration.
Thanks for joining us on Livestream and Twitter, Martin. Captured much of what happened online that day http://storify.com/ibmevents/the-world-is-changing-ibm-analyst-insights-briefi
Very thought provoking but is in IBM corporate-speak, which I find hard to penetrate easily. I notice that companies like IBM are slowly sliding from the forefront of I.T. worldwide, yet still are verbose in their definition of where future profitability lies.
Something doesn’t add up.
It is true that datacentre needs are changing-their are exploding with the Cloud. But at IBM they are evolving? That is a markedly slow snails pace.
The simplicity of pay-as-you-go Cloud offerings from Google and Amazon is more likely to attract growing small businesses, which everyone agrees are the economic future out of recession.
The problem I see for IBM is how to get to this much simpler world where customers broadly understand what they are paying for, and know where they can easily access it, especially in Google’s case its Search engine is a window for its own products which increasingly include business Cloud packages.
The size of IBMs turnover induces them to stay in the comfort zone of current profitability, and slip more and more from relevance in I.T. as a brand.
The top management must be as brave as medieval knights are reputed to have been, and slay the dragon-that is move more to a public Cloud-centred business, as well as retaining their current business and position for technical excellence.
I find it hard to visualise what is going on in IBM, but I do see its emergence into the public space less and less, despite a few millions spent on advertising “We are not dead, it was just a rumour!”.
They have got to get relevant to the public. I think if the battle to get a public image is abandoned, the company should be split up and sold in diamond encrusted divisions to those who have the vision and cash to secure Cloud dominance and prime position in I.T. worldwide.
This will be forced eventually if it looses relevence and is picked off by more successful growing companies.
We have to compare IBM now to what it used to be, the best investment in the world. With all their skills they are lost without strong direction from the very top.
Excellent overview Martin